it's either F1 or F2 to open it, can't remember which off the top of my head. i pops open a window on the left side of the screen. one lists planets and can be sorted by various criteria. the other lists ships. i think SBs show up on that list somewhere, but as i'm at work, i can't verify this ATM.

Some folks call it things like "mini planet list" in posts. You can also display it using the leftmost button in the center group, and when it is open it has buttons you can click to toggle between planets and ships.

There's also a Starbases button, but unfortunately it shows *all* starbases, not just yours. The info does show base offense, defense, and hitpoints, but it gives no specifics about open module slots.

a big reason i rename my starbases immediately after contructing them. then at least the alphabetical sorting helps me a bit. but the info you mentioned would be a nice addition.

the way sorting works on the mini lists could use a slight tweek IMHO. on the planets mini-list, for example, there are many useful ways you can sort the list, but the sorting option itself would work better as a pull-down list. it can be frustrating using the left/right arrows to cycle through the various options, especially because i don't always remember the name of a particular option, and IIRC they're not in alphabetical order anyway.

I rename my mines & most finished bases, but that's not really necessary if you are OK with scanning the thumbnails--I mostly play Thalans with their standard ship style, so our stuff stands out pretty clearly in the list w/o needing to read. The problem with the Not Our Bases in the list, for me anyway, is just the clutter that means more clicking to finish scrolling all the way through.

I use the Planets minilist pretty heavily for the "strongly encouraged" spending after my income gets well over 10k per turn. The sort there would be *much* better if it put the Nothing planets at the top or bottom instead of in the middle of the alphabetical sort.

If I'm understanding how the feature will work, I'd agree that the name is a bit of an exaggeration; the term "governor" does imply that the thing would be making some choices on its own somehow, at least through a set of decision parameters that BoogieBac already says are too tall an order for 2.0.

But the more accurate alternatives might have just sounded to dull to the devs: "Custom Build Lists?" "Colony Development Plans?"

I think he meant that it is spelt wrong in the tabs - it should be Planetary Governors, not Planetary Governers. Could be wrong though.

I've taken to keeping the number but renaming them by 'sector' for a given region, with a suffix for type - i.e. "Thalan 1032m" for a military base in the Thalan sector, except for resource bases which I get a little more descriptive on since there's so few of them "Science Station Galileo" "Fuel Depot IV" et al.

Renaming is the only way I get good use from waypoints too - I pretty much keep one waypoint with the same name on every Starbase, then switch transport outputs as required, with a couple 'at large' waypoints for things like fleet formation.

Jonnan

Bugger, double post, dead edit button - apologies - Jonnan

please don´t forget to make the governors prioritice on bonus tiles with the right buildings e.g. when i have a moral building and a factory the govenor should place them on their correct bonus tiles.

This improvement looks fantastic.  Thank you .

I think the governor's should be "real people" with an AI. they should build wathever they want , supervised by the ruler. I dont want to check every planet if they got what they need. Maybe, the ruler should give a budget to the governor's.

The governor queue does not auto-update with new tech as BoogieBac has indicated in his original post as of 2.03.